What are the issues with the proposed development at the Junction?
- The building fills nearly the entire City lot, removing almost all open space and all surface parking. The Council asked to see a 34,000 sq ft option, but the developer made a deal to acquire the adjoining auto repair business and delivered only a single 50,000+ sq ft plan.
- The height of the building does not match the two-story height of surrounding commercial buildings. It’s more typical of a three or even four-story building, with huge mass because it runs the entire length of the lot and adjoining business.
- Gridlock at the Junction is already bad at rush hour. Traffic engineers showed the intersection will “fail” with the addition of the new offices and retail. They found that drivers trying to exit the underground garage into gridlock will have a five-car backup.
- Deliveries for the food Co-op on the adjacent lot would be forced off the City lot and onto a “lay-by” along the highway in front, creating new safety and traffic hazards, and potentially jeopardizing local businesses with backed-up vehicles.
- It is questionable whether the food Co-op can survive construction, permanent loss of off-street loading, and permanent loss of public surface parking in the lot.
- Increased retail rents, unaffordable to local businesses, will drive gentrification. The majority of Junction businesses signed a letter expressing their concerns about the development.
- The developer provides only a “Gazebo size” public space along the street, no large open space for public events now held on the lot.
- The building would span two lots with two different owners (the City, and the auto repair lot that would be acquired by the developer). This creates important legal issues, especially if the development fails or is sold.
- The current site plan does not respond to the majority of the requests made by City Council in their resolution last fall asking for changes to the plan. We have documented some 70 unresolved issues with the current site plan.
- This project gives control of the last flat, open, available public land in the heart of our City to a private developer.
Haven’t the residents commenting on the plan been evenly divided?
- No. City officials often have said they “hear from both sides” but have consistently declined to quantify the Citywide feedback they are getting. Former Councilmember Tim Male, did find a majority in his Ward were against the plan last fall.
- So we (CVTJ) recently requested all Junction emails sent to the City over a two-year period, and tallied them. A clear majority of residents (two to one) weighing in had concerns about the plan.
- This confirmed the pattern at City Council meetings, where those concerned by the Junction plan have vastly outnumbered those speaking for it. Those speaking against the plan at City Council have been notable for racial and income diversity, and for including Junction shoppers, workers, residents, and business owners.
- We (CVTJ) have over 1000 concerned citizens on our email list, and over 900 signatures on our petition asking the Council to vote NO on the plan.
Where are we in the process?
- The City has already begun crafting the resolution which would give the final greenlight for the project. The vote on the resolution is scheduled for Wednesday July 25th. The last chance to weigh in at City Council before they release the draft resolution is Wednesday June 27th. It is essential to come out and speak (3 minutes, no need to sign up ahead) now, and email the Council now. See our Action Steps in the sidebar.
- Meanwhile, the City is paying for a mediation process between the developer and the Co-op and has given them until September for that process. The City has made clear they will not wait for the mediation to conclude before voting on the plan. Please ask the Council: What is the point of mediation if you are not going to include the resulting design changes in your resolution?
- The complete traffic studies (one commissioned by the developer, one commissioned by the city) were just delivered. They show that the development will cause traffic at the Junction to “fail” (in terms of minutes spent at each light).
- The traffic experts suggest a complete redesign of the Junction layout, rerouting Sycamore to run through what is now the triangle park (BY Morrison Park) to Carroll Ave, and moving the historic pavilion. It is unclear how or why the City would go ahead with a big development at the Junction before restructuring the layout of roadways, or how they would expect these two major projects to happen simultaneously.
- The City requires an Equity Impact Statement for every City project. Right now, two different Equity statements have been issued, but City officials admit that both were inadequate, and they have said they are “revisiting” the statement. (The first statement found no effect on Racial Equity with the development, the second found an improvement based on pedestrian ability to cross the Junction traffic, which made no sense).
Would it help if an outside expert did some kind of analysis?
- Nationally-known community economics expert Michael Shuman wrote an analysis (pro bono) of the planned Junction development. To read it, go to michaelhshuman.com.
Is CVTJ anti-development?
No. We are for:
- Visionary placemaking to revitalize the Junction,
- Innovative, local, independent businesses,
- Maximizing the space open to all rather than requiring purchases,
- Prioritizing public good rather than maximizing income,
- Preserving a “low and open” neighborhood architecture,
- Preserving our only downtown grocery store,
- Using public space for public events/arts/play and green space,
- Ensuring the highest environmental standards,
- Improving Junction traffic and safety.
Unfortunately, NDC’s proposals do not respond to the desires of the community as documented in the Junction Task Force report, the RFP, the Development Agreement, or the City Council’s fall 2017 Resolution.
Is the Co-op really threatened by the current Junction development proposal?
- Yes. The primary threats are proposed substitution of a “lay-by” for the off-street loading zone, the ability of the Co-op to stay open during construction on the lot next door, and the permanent loss of the public surface parking next door.
- Among other things, loss of free surface parking on the City’s lot (it has been free for the past year since the ticket machine there stopped working) will mean everyone who wants to park at the Junction will try to use the Co-op’s small free lot on Sycamore.
What are the community benefits of the Takoma Park Silver Spring (TPSS) Co-op?
- The Co-op is the only full-service grocery store located at the center of the City, and a major employer critical to the local economy, with a diverse staff and customer base.
- Walkable local grocers are a central tool in fighting food insecurity and obesity — which is why cities including Washington, DC provide subsidies for them. They help reduce vehicles on the road, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and build community.
- The Co-op takes SNAP and provides other benefits to low-income and senior shoppers.
- The Co-op offers healthy foods and produce, and acts as an incubator for small local businesses by providing space for over 100 local businesses to sell their products.
- Because it sells more locally-produced products, money spent at the Co-op stays in the local economy.
- The Co-op is locally controlled by members, unlike other area grocery chains.
- The Co-op offers ecological options such as bulk goods, refilling of reusable containers, and many organic and fair trade products.
Why is an off-street loading zone important for the survival of the Co-op?
- The Co-op currently rents a portion of the City-owned lot for a loading zone. While the developer had off-street loading on the lot in their original proposal, once they had the contract, they substituted a “lay-by”: a pull-up spot on the highway in front of the Co-op.
- Every day, the Co-op receives deliveries of groceries by 18-wheeler trucks and other vehicles. The Co-op cannot control the size of trucks or timing of deliveries. Up to three or four trucks may be delivering simultaneously in the mornings. These trucks will be backed up on the street trying to unload if they cannot drive onto the lot as they do now.
- The Co-op will lose the ability to not only get deliveries on that side of the building but get their trash and recycling picked up there. The developer has said they have no intention to help solve the Co-op’s trash and recycling issues, and they expect the Co-op to use the Sycamore lot. The Sycamore lot is too small, would prevent shoppers from parking there if it was used as a loading and trash zone, and would create noise and truck traffic in the residential neighborhood behind the Co-op.
What are the traffic and safety issues with the lay-by?
- The lay-by does not provide enough space for simultaneous delivery by more than one large truck. Additional trucks will either be backed up along Carroll Avenue waiting to unload, they might double-park, blocking traffic, or they will simply drive away, disrupting Junction businesses awaiting deliveries.
- Even a small truck in front of the Co-op is going to impede sight lines, and block visibility for pedestrians, bikers, and other cars at this complex Junction. Impatient motorists may pull out past waiting trucks, creating safety hazards.
- The lay-by displaces a vital bus stop, and the bike station, and it’s not clear where they will go.
- The fact that elementary and middle school students cross through the Junction in the early morning, at the same time as commuters and grocery deliveries, makes the crossing more perilous.
- Fire Department vehicles also enter and exit at the Junction, and the Fire Chief has expressed concern about the development and lay-by at a City Council meeting.
Community Vision for Takoma Junction (CVTJ)
For more, find us on facebook and twitter, or email us at TJCommunityVision@gmail.com
Sign the Petition calling on City Council to reject the current plan:
Most recent Takoma Park Silver Spring Co-op statement on Takoma Junction here:
City documents on Takoma Junction here:
Analysis of the proposed development by an independent economist: