New City Council Endorsements from Union and Environmental Leaders

Two new sign-on statements for City Council endorsements were released this week:

1. From City residents in the union movement:

Having devoted our careers to the union movement and having acquainted ourselves with the candidates we are happy to endorse Jessica Landman in Ward 1 and Roger Schlegel in Ward 3 for Takoma Park City Council. 

We know Jessica and Roger share our view that strong, effective unions are needed to improve the lives of all working people.  We believe they are the best candidates to represent these interests on our city’s Council.

Karen Ackerman, former AFL-CIO political director

Sally Davies, former President AFSCME University of Maryland College Park

Dennis Desmond, former Business Manager, LIUNA Local 11

Fred Feinstein, former NLRB General Counsel

Tom Gagliardo, civil rights, labor and employment attorney

Beth Grupp, union consultant

Paul Huebner, rank & file activist in Laborers Local # 74 & Fin. Secretary-Treasurer in Carpenters Local #1110.

Jennifer Martin, former President, Montgomery County Education Association

Bob Muehlenkamp, former Teamster Organizing Director

Steve Rosenthal, former political director of the AFL-CIO

Saul Schniderman- Former President AFSCME Library of Congress Guild

Miriam Szapiro, former chief NLRB Regional Advice Branch and union-side labor lawyer 

Joe Uehlein, former Secretary-Treasurer of Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO and labor musician.


2. From City residents who are environmental and climate activists:

We, the undersigned, endorse the following candidates for Takoma Park City Council in 2024 because of their deep longstanding knowledge of, and commitment to,  climate and environmental issues.

Bob DreherEnvironmental lawyer and conservationist; worked for EPA, DOJ, FWS, Earthjustice, Defenders of Wildlife and Potomac Riverkeeper Network
Brenda PlattEnvironmental program director, national nonprofit organization, 30+ years
Byrne H. KellyLandscape Architect/Environmental Planner, Takoma Stormwater Solutions, DC Solar Coalition (plankholder) Installed Solar on the White House circa.1978
Catherine TunisEnvironmental Policy Analyst, retired; former Takoma Park Committee on the Environment
Charlotte SchoenmannArchitect, lighting activist
Colleen CordesFormer Psychology & Environment Fellow at Friends of the Earth, former TP Tree Commission chair
David HunterInternational environmental and human rights professor and advocate
David ReedEnvironmental economist, author of 7 books on international environment and security
De HermanJewish Earth Alliance, Takoma Park Drawdown, Climate Action Coffee
Diana YountsTPEM Environmental Working Group
Diane CurranEnvironmental and nuclear safety attorney
Diane MacEachernFormer Director of Communications, Sierra Club; Founder & Publisher, Big Green Purse. Resident of Takoma Park since 1984.
Dr. David BlocksteinCo-Director, Worldwide Climate and Justice Education Week
Dr. Robin BroadResearch Professor of Environment & Development, American University
Esther SiegelSustainable farmer, community activist
Ferd HoefnerSenior policy director, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
Gillian CaldwellFormer CEO Global Witness and former Campaign Director 1Sky (now 350.org)
Gina GaspinFounding member of TPSS Food Coop
Jimmy DaukasSenior manager at national farmland protection non-profit organization
John CavanaghInstitute for Policy Studies, the outfit co-founded by Jamie Raskin’s dad Marc
Joseph KlocknerLEED AP BD+C, Klockner & Company – Sustainable Builders since 1982
Karen ElrichCo-founder TPSS food co-op, member Climate Action Coffee
Karen LangeJournalist on wildlife, sustainability and the environment
Kirsten StadeConservation Biologist, sustainability + environmental overshoot author
Kopal JhaTPSS co-op board, native ecosystem rejuvenation
Linda Pentz GunterJournalist, founder of TP-based anti-nuclear/environmental advocacy group, Beyond Nuclear
Lorraine PearsallEnvironmental scientist and ardent conservationist
Marc ElrichExecutive Montgomery County and former Takoma Park Councilmember
Margaret BowmanWater policy and climate resilience advocate in nonprofits and foundations
Michael BlauAerospace software engineer
Mike TaborSustainable farmer, community activist
Nadine BlochFormer NOAA Office of Education & Sustainability, 35+ yr Environmental Activist + educator
Paul ChrostowskiEnvironmental consultant and author of over 100 scientific papers
Philip BogdonoffBoard member: Biodiversity for a Livable Climate, EcoRestoration Alliance, +Community Food Forest Collective; Consultant, World Bank Environment Dept
Randy GibsonOutgoing TP City Councilmember; Climate Action Coffee, Takoma Stormwater Solutions, Food Forest group
Robert EngelmanFormer president, Worldwatch Institute
Robert GooNational expert on stormwater and Federal agency employee
Robin SchoenScience policy, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Shari FriedmanWorking in climate and sustainability for 30 years, focus on policy and finance.
Stephen WhitneyClimate Action Coffee, Takoma Stormwater Solutions and Friends of Sligo Creek
Steve ShapiroPast president American Federation of Government Employees Local 3331,  EPA HQ

Stormwater Issues at the Junction

 

Screen Shot 2019-03-14 at 5.03.08 PM

 

The proposed Takoma Junction development plan is now going through the County approval process. But the City must still approve the tree plan, and the stormwater plan. So, stormwater experts with Community Vision for Takoma (CVT) analyzed the developer’s stormwater plan, and wrote this one-page summary of the many flaws in the plan.

 

TAKOMA JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER ISSUES

  • The City of Takoma Park has not reviewed stormwater aspects of the current proposal; the City’s approval letter in the record is based on the defunct April 2018 plan.
  • The City review of the older plan was incomplete; it did not consider many aspects of the proposal.
  • Neither the plan nor the City’s review considered the fact that nearby residents are already experiencing water management problems.
  • Currently most of the stormwater at the site flows from the City-owned parking lot to Carroll Avenue where it eventually enters City storm drains.  The developer’s plan would divert this water to a storm drain on Columbia Avenue.
  • Neither the City nor the developer conducted necessary studies including geotechnical, hydrogeological or storm sewer capacity studies.
  • Neither the soils at the construction site nor the soils on the wooded slope have been well characterized.  Clay layers in soil can make water management much more difficult; the limited studies available show clay layers on the site.
  • Stormwater can either run off over the surface or infiltrate the soil to become groundwater. This has implications for both surface drainage management and the ability of subsurface water to enter basements.  Neither the City nor the developer has studied groundwater at the site.
  • Neither the City nor the developer has assessed the potential impact of this additional stormwater on the downstream storm water management system.  It is not known if this system has enough capacity or what the potential impacts could be.
  • The proposed stormwater plan is under-designed given recent rainfall patterns and the anticipated effects of climate change in the future. The design, operation, and efficacy of the proposed stormwater management system is unclear.  The overall efficiency of the proposed green roofs has not been determined.
  • There is no analysis of water containing sediment that can accumulate in the large excavation proposed for this site.
  • In summary, it is difficult to see how this proposal meets the Maryland State guidance of controlling stormwater to the maximum extent practicable.
  • Based on all this, it is recommended that a refined comprehensive analysis, that (1) includes stormwater, groundwater and construction water and (2) is based on geotechnical and hydrogeological data, be undertaken by an independent competent authority with complete transparency.
  • This is a summary of a longer report linked here.

Junction Construction: Predicted Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollution

Below, we print the recent public comment to City Council by resident Paul Chrostowski, PhD, QEP, on the greenhouse gas emissions from construction of the proposed Junction development plan. We also print a companion piece he posted yesterday on the air pollution impacts.

TAKOMA PARK CITY COUNCIL Public Comment

MAY 27, 2018

Environmental impacts of major construction are often overlooked, with a focus on the finished product rather than the construction process. However, construction can have significant impacts on air and water quality.

For example, the removal and disposal of the existing asphalt/concrete parking lot will likely involve jackhammers, compressors, front-end loaders, and roll-off or dump truck haulers. All of these operations use diesel fuel which emits greenhouse gases, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and fine particulate. In addition, particulate matter from the asphalt and concrete itself will be emitted. At typical published rates of activity, this could mean about two weeks of constant air pollution and noise. As many as 40 loads would be required to transport this material.

During my 6 years on the Committee on the Environment, I pressed for environmental impact analysis of proposed major construction in the City. Since this has not been done, I have undertaken my own evaluation starting with a Limited Life Cycle Analysis of the proposed NDC development plan, focusing on greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.

I based my analysis on material on the City’s website including the development plan: demolition and removal of the existing parking lot, 50,000 sq. ft. building with one level underground parking, about 8,000 sq. ft. of paving, and no recycling of demolition materials (none required in RFP or agreements). This did not include demolition of Takoma Auto Clinic (Johnny’s) structure, excavation for underground parking, or any street reconfiguration (all of which will also have impacts).

Using standard methods in the environmental engineering profession, I predict that this activity will release about 88,000 MTCO2e (190 million pounds). This is more than the Brendle Group 2013 report predicted for 2018 for the entirety of all greenhouse gas emissions in Takoma Park and would negate all the improvements we have made over the last several years. One would have to plant over one million trees to offset this effect. In reality, we would not be able to mitigate this impact. An alternative design concept I have seen is for a 34,000 sq. ft. building with no underground parking. This would cut the greenhouse gas emissions by about 60% and with careful attention to construction practices and offsets could be mitigated.

I encourage Council to pay close attention to these environmental impacts and engage any developer in a discussion to mitigate the impacts. The legacy of this project should not be that it contributed in any way to climate change or local air pollution.

 

AIR POLLUTION IMPACTS OF PROPOSED JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT

July 6, 2018

In my testimony of May 27, I presented the results of a technical analysis of greenhouse gases (GHG) during construction of the proposed development. At that time, I did not include emissions from the excavation for the underground parking level or impacts from demolition of the Takoma Auto Clinic. Including these, the GHG emissions will approach 90,000 MTCO2e (about 200 million pounds). These GHGs will contribute to climate change and stay in the atmosphere for some 39 years – long after a decision on this project has been made. These emissions are so high that they cannot be mitigated unless the project is made smaller.

In the meantime, I performed an air pollution analysis of diesel exhaust that will be emitted during the excavation for the underground parking. To do this, I focused on air pollutants regulated under the federal Clean Air Act – nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter. In addition to these pollutants, diesel exhaust also contains hundreds of other pollutants that have been associated with human health effects. I used standard engineering assumptions that the underground garage would be 10 feet tall with a 2-foot subbase resulting in a 12-foot deep excavation. After subtracting 1 foot for asphalt removal and using the dimensions from NDC’s diagrams, this results in a 14,400 cubic yard excavation. We don’t know NDC’s excavation plans, so I developed a benchmark scenario using one 200 HP dozer, a track loader, and 30 cubic yard dump trucks. It would take about 6 months to excavate this hole using this equipment. Using more (or larger) equipment would shorten this time but increase diesel exhaust emissions.

I obtained emission data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the scientific literature. I then used a simple air quality model to project these emissions out to 350 feet from the center of the proposed project, where people are likely to be exposed. At this distance, the diesel particulate concentrations would exceed EPA’s screening level that is based on pulmonary inflammation and the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for oxides of nitrogen. Besides pulmonary inflammation, exposure to diesel exhaust has also been associated with cancer, cardiovascular disease, central nervous system effects and developmental effects according to the EPA and the World Health Organization. In addition to local health effects, this excavation would add about 250 MT of pollutants to the airshed.

Exceeding screening levels in a preliminary environmental impact analysis does not necessarily mean that there will be health effects, but it does mean that there should be an in-depth refined study prior to implementation of construction. This would be based on NDC’s exact construction plans and would include appropriate mitigation measures. It is premature to approve the development plan without considering its potential impact on the health of Takoma Park residents.